Integrasi Kawasan Candi Plaosan Lor dan Candi Plaosan Kidul dengan Inovasi Desain Streetscape Koridor Komersial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37631/pendapa.v6i2.538Keywords:
Placemaking Koridor komersial Candi Plaosan Desain streetscapeAbstract
Kawasan wisata Candi Plaosan memiliki koridor area komersial yang terbangun secara organik oleh masyarakat setempat. Candi Plaosan memiliki keunikan karena terpisah menjadi dua kompleks, Candi Plaosan Lor dan Candi Plaosan Kidul. Koridor area komersial wisata Candi Plaosan memiliki potensi untuk mengintegrasikan dua kompleks Candi Plaosan yang terpisah sebagai koridor penghubung antara dua kompleks candi tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk secara kritis mengkaji koridor area komersial jalan diantara Candi Plaosan Lor dan Kidul serta mengkaji inovasi streetscape yang dapat diterapkan pada koridor area komersial tersebut sehingga berdampak pada citra visual dan sosial ekonomi kawasan wisata Candi Plaosan. Peneliti menggunakan metode kualitatif melalui observasi lapangan, pemetaan fisik dan wawancara. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan adanya pemanfaatan koridor komersial yang mampu berimplikasi pada peningkatan kesejahteraan masyarakat namun demikian perlu adanya penataan yang memadai sehingga terintegrasi dengan Kawasan cagar budaya dan tidak merusak situs. Rekomendasi berupa inovasi streetscape di koridor tersebut terutama melalui lima aspek, yaitu feasibility, accessibility, safety, comfort, serta pleasure ability.ÂReferences
Alfonzo, M. A. (2005). To walk or not to walk? The hierarchy of walking needs. Environment and Behavior, 37(6), 808–836. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916504274016
Andranovich, G. D. and R. G. (1993). Doing urban research (Vol. 33). sage.
Charlwood, C. (2004). Torbay Streetscape Guidelines. Torbay Council, Torques, 11–13.
Crankshaw, N. (2012). Creating vibrant public spaces: streetscape design in commercial and historic districts. Island press.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design : qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
Darmawan, E. and S. S. R. (2005). pace Parttern of The Street Corridor (Case Study: S. Parman Street, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia). International Journal on Architectural Science, 6, 70–81.
Gibbs, K. and S. S. J. and N. L. and B. D. and C. F. J. (2012). Income disparities in street features that encourage walking. Bridging the Gap Program.
Groat, L. and W. D. (2002). Qualitative research. Architectural Research Methods, 173–202.
Mohamed, A. M. R. M., Samarghandi, S., Samir, H., & Mohammed, M. F. M. (2020). The role of placemaking approach in revitalising AL-ULA heritage site: Linkage and access as key factors. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 15(6), 921–926. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.150616
Pradharma, B. F., Alnindya, D. T., Pourine, B. A. M., Ekomadyo, A. S., & Susanto, V. (2021). Street Experience Jalan Braga : Memahami Pemenuhan Kebutuhan Pejalan Kaki melalui Media Google Street View. Jurnal Arsitektur ZONASI, 4(1), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.17509/jaz.v4i1.29920
Prayogo, E. (2019). MANAJEMEN LANSKAP BUDAYA DAN PERLINDUNGAN LINGKUNGAN DI CANDI PLAOSAN.
Prabasmara, P. G., & Subroto, T. Y. W. (2018). Konsep livabilitas sebagai dasar optimalisasi ruang publik Studi kasus: Solo City Walk, Jalan Slamet Riyadi, Surakarta. JURNAL ARSITEKTUR PENDAPA, 1(2), 13-22.
Preambudi, A. (2020). Tipologi Potensi Kepariwisataan Desa Sekitar Candi Borobudur. JURNAL ARSITEKTUR PENDAPA, 3(1), 13-17.
Rahardjo, S. (2013). BEBERAPA PERMASALAHAN PELESTARIAN KAWASAN CAGAR BUDAYA DAN STRATEGI SOLUSINYA.
Rehan, R. M. (2013). Sustainable streetscape as an effective tool in sustainable urban design. HBRC Journal, 9(2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2013.03.001
Sakinah, R., Kusuma, H. E., Tampubolon, A. C., & Prakarso, B. (2018). Kriteria Jalur Pedestrian di Indonesia. Jurnal Lingkungan Binaan Indonesia, 7(2), 81–85. https://doi.org/10.32315/jlbi.7.2.81
Verbeek, T., Boussauw, K., & Pisman, A. (2014). Presence and trends of linear sprawl: Explaining ribbon development in the north of Belgium. Landscape and Urban Planning, 128, 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.04.022
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 JURNAL ARSITEKTUR PENDAPA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the Pendapa Architecture Journal  right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in JELE (Journal of English Language and Education). Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JELE (Journal of English Language and Education)
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Â
